Trans-axillary thoracic outlet decompression.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a group of conditions thought to be caused by the compression of neurovascular structures going to the upper extremity. TOS is a difficult disease to diagnose, and surgical treatment remains challenging. Many different surgical techniques for the treatment of TOS have been described in the literature and many reasonable to good outcomes have been reported, which makes it hard for surgeons to determine which techniques should be used. Our aim was to describe the rationale, techniques, and outcomes associated with the surgical treatment of TOS. Most patients in our center are treated primarily through a trans-axillary approach. We will elaborate on the technical details of performing trans-axillary thoracic outlet decompression. The essential steps during surgery are illustrated with videos. We focused on the idea behind performing a trans-axillary thoracic outlet decompression in primary cases. Institutional data on the outcomes of this surgical approach are described briefly.

Evaluating the implementation of personalised outcomes forecasts to optimise supervised exercise therapy in patients with intermittent claudication in the Netherlands: a multimethods study.

BACKGROUND: To support the optimisation of supervised exercise therapy (SET) in patients with intermittent claudication, we developed personalised outcomes forecasts (POFs), which visualise estimated walking distance and quality of life for individual patients. The POFs may enable healthcare professionals, such as physical and exercise therapists, to improve shared decision-making and patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To assess differences in patient outcomes (functional walking distance, maximal walking distance and health-related quality of life) and the level of shared decision-making before and after the implementation of POFs in the conservative treatment of patients with intermittent claudication. METHODS: An interrupted time series design was used to compare preimplementation and postimplementation differences on patient outcomes. Using routinely collected data, differences from baseline to 6 months were compared between patients before and patients after the implementation. To compare levels of shared decision-making, we conducted observations of initial consults within a sample of physical or exercise therapists both before and after the implementation. Audiorecords of observations were scored on shared decision-making using the OPTION-5 instrument. RESULTS: Differences in improvements between patients with whom POFs were discussed (n=317) and patients before the implementation of POFs (n=721) did not reach statistical significance for both functional walking distance (experimental vs. control=+23%, p=0.11) and maximal walking distance (experimental vs. control=+21%, p=0.08). For health-related quality of life, the POFs-informed patients showed a statistically significant greater improvement of 4% (p=0.04). Increased levels of shared decision-making were observed in postimplementation consults (n=20) when compared with preimplementation consults (n=36), as the median OPTION-5 total score showed a statistically significant increase from 45 to 55 points (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating POFs into daily practice of SET for patients with intermittent claudication could assist in improving health-related quality of life and enhancing patient involvement. Using POFs did not result in statistically significant different improvements between groups on walking distances. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL8838.

Lower Leg Lateral Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome: Prospective Surgical Treatment Outcomes for Isolated or Combined Lateral Fasciotomy.

BACKGROUND: Chronic exertional compartment syndrome involving the lower leg lateral compartment (lat-CECS) seldom occurs isolated but is usually combined with CECS of the anterior (ant-CECS) or deep posterior compartment (dp-CECS). Patient characteristics in lat-CECS and outcome after surgery are largely unknown. The aim of this prospective case series was to describe patient characteristics and symptoms and to report on outcome following a fasciotomy. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with lat-CECS based on exertional lateral lower leg symptoms and elevated intracompartmental pressure (ICP) measurements according to the Pedowitz criteria (ICP ≥ 15 mm Hg at rest, and/or ≥30 mm Hg after 1 minute, and/or ≥20 mm Hg 5 minutes after exercise) were eligible for this study. A standard intake questionnaire scoring symptom patterns was completed by all patients. Patients who were operated for lat-CECS were asked to complete a 3-month and 12-month postoperative questionnaire scoring symptoms and surgical outcome. Patients with a history of CECS surgery, recent lower leg trauma, or peripheral neurovascular disease were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 881 patients with possible lower leg CECS completed an intake questionnaire and 88 (10%) were diagnosed with lat-CECS according to the Pedowitz criteria (isolated lat-CECS n = 10; lat/ant CECS n = 54, lat/ant/dp CECS n = 19, lat/dp CECS n = 5). Severe pain during exercise and moderate tightness during rest were frequently reported. A group of 28 patients (49 legs; isolated lat-CECS n = 2; lat/ant CECS n = 22, lat/ant/dp CECS n = 3, lat/dp CECS n = 1) was analyzed after fasciotomy. Complications were minor (wound infection requiring antibiotics, n = 3; temporary complex regional pain syndrome with spontaneous recovery, n = 1). Superficial peroneal nerve damage was not observed. One year after surgery, 64% rated outcome as excellent or good, whereas 71% had resumed sports activities. CONCLUSION: One in 10 patients with anterolateral exertional lower leg pain evaluated in a tertiary referral center met diagnostic criteria for lat-CECS. Pain and tightness were present during exertion and were often reported occurring during rest and at night. In this series, we found fasciotomy-either an isolated (lateral) or a multiple (combined with anterior and/or deep posterior) compartment fasciotomy-is safe and beneficial in most patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Nationwide implementation of personalized outcomes forecasts to support physical therapists in treating patients with intermittent claudication: Protocol for an interrupted time series study.

INTRODUCTION: Shared decision-making is the cornerstone of patient-centered care. However, evidence suggests that the application of shared decision-making in physical therapy practice is limited. To elicit shared decision-making and thereby potentially improve patient outcomes for patients with intermittent claudication, we developed a decision support system. This decision support system provides personalized outcomes forecasts that visualize the estimated walking distance of an individual patient. We hypothesize that personalized outcomes forecasts can support physical therapists in personalizing care to the needs and priorities of the individual patient to improve therapy outcomes. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES: The primary aim is to evaluate the impact of personalized outcomes forecasts for patients with intermittent claudication to optimize personalized treatment. Second, this study aims to evaluate the process of implementation. METHODS: This study uses a prospective interrupted time series (ITS) design. Participating physical therapists are divided into four clusters. Every month of the study period, a new cluster will be invited to begin using the decision support system. We aim to include data of 11,250 newly referred patients for physical therapy treatment. All therapists associated with a network of specialized therapists (Chronic CareNet) and patients treated by these therapists are eligible to participate. The decision support system, called the KomPas, makes use of personalized outcomes forecasts, which visualize the estimated outcome of supervised exercise therapy for an individual patient with intermittent claudication. Personalized outcomes forecasts are developed using a neighbors-based approach that selects patients similar to the index patient (a.k.a. neighbors) from a large database. Outcomes to evaluate impact of implementation are patients' functional and maximal walking distance, quality of life and shared decision-making. Process evaluation will be measured in terms of utilization efficacy, including the outcomes dropout rate and reasons to (not) use the personalized outcomes forecasts. Data will be routinely collected through two online systems: the Chronic CareNet Quality system, and the website logs of the decision support system. Additionally, observations and semi-structured interviews will be conducted with a small subset of therapists. ETHICS: Formal medical ethical approval by the Medical Research Ethics Committees United 'MEC-U' was not required for this study under Dutch law (reference number 2020-6250).

General Overview and Diagnostic (Imaging) Techniques for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

Thoracic outlet syndrome is an uncommon and controversial syndrome. Three different diagnoses can be made based on the compressed structure, arterial TOS, venous TOS, and neurogenic TOS, though combinations do exist as well. Diagnosing NTOS is difficult since no specific objective diagnostic modalities exist. This has resulted in a lot of controversy in recent decades. NTOS remains a clinical diagnosis and is mostly diagnosed based on the exclusion of an extensive list of differential diagnoses. To guide the diagnosis and treatment of TOS, a group of experts published the reporting standards for TOS in 2016. However, a consensus was not reached regarding a blueprint for a daily care pathway in this document. Therefore, we constructed a care pathway based on the reporting standards for both the diagnosis and treatment of NTOS patients. This care pathway includes a multidisciplinary approach in which different diagnostic tests and additional imaging techniques are combined to diagnose NTOS or guide patients in their treatment for differential diagnoses. The aim of the present work is to discuss and explain the diagnostic part of this care pathway.

Editor's Choice - Two Year Results of the Randomised DISCOVER Trial Comparing Covered Versus Bare Metal Stents in the Common Iliac Artery.

OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that covered stents (CS) may lower restenosis rates compared with bare metal stents (BMS) after endovascular treatment of the common iliac artery. This trial aimed to provide additional evidence on the efficacy of CS vs. BMS in the common iliac artery. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, single blind controlled superiority trial compared balloon expandable CS and balloon expandable BMS for advanced atherosclerotic lesions in the common iliac artery; this was defined as a stenosis > 3 cm in length or occlusion. The primary end point was freedom from binary restenosis after two years of follow up. The study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (version: October 2008) and registered with the Dutch Trial register (NTR3381). RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-four limbs were included between 2012 and 2019 with 87 limbs in each group. Six patients crossed over from the BMS group to the CS group but were analysed according to an intention to treat principle. Freedom from binary restenosis after two years of follow up was 84.7% (95% CI 76.7 - 92.7%) in the BMS group and 89.1% (95% CI 82.4 - 95.8%) in the CS group (p = .40). Freedom from occlusion was 95.0% (95% CI 90.3 - 95.7%) in the BMS group and 96.4% (95% CI 92.5 - 100%) in the CS group (p = .66). Freedom from target lesion revascularisation was 91.1% (95% CI 84.8 - 97.3%) and 95.2% (95% CI 90.7 -99.7%), respectively (p = .31). Technical success, complications, haemodynamic success, and clinical success were also comparable between both groups. Per-protocol analysis did not affect the outcomes of the study. CONCLUSION: No difference was found between balloon expandable CS and BMS for treating advanced atherosclerotic lesions of the common iliac artery.

Surgical approaches for thoracic outlet decompression in the treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a controversial and uncommon syndrome. Three different diagnoses can be made based on the compressed structure: arterial TOS, venous TOS, and neurogenic TOS. Diagnosing TOS, especially neurogenic TOS, remains difficult since a single diagnostic tool does not exist. Although this resulted in a lot of confusion, standardization of care and outcome improved daily care practice measures in the last decade. Current treatment algorithms consist of both conservative and surgical treatment approaches, which should be chosen depending on the type of TOS and extend of the complaints. Surgical treatment of TOS is performed via thoracic outlet decompression (TOD). TOD surgery includes complete resection of the first rib (cartilage to cartilage), transection of the scalene muscles and complete neurolysis/venolysis or arteriolysis. Four different approaches can be chosen for TOD surgery: the transaxillary (TA), supraclavicular (SC), paraclavicular (PC), and infraclavicular (IC) approach. The TA, SC, and PC approach can be used for every form of TOS. However, the PC approach is mostly used for treating venous TOS. The IC approach has no role in treating neurogenic or arterial TOS and is only used for venous TOS. Every approach has its own benefits and limitations and literature does not agree on what approach is best. Therefore, the used surgical approach for TOD should be based on the surgeon's preference and experience. The aim of this review is to present an overview of the diagnostic pathway and provide an in-depth description of the surgical approach in each form of TOS.

Editor's Choice - Endurant Stent Graft in Patients with Challenging Neck Anatomy "One Step Outside Instructions for Use": Early and Midterm Results from the EAGLE Registry.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the Endurant for Challenging Anatomy: Global Experience (EAGLE) registry is to evaluate prospectively the technical and clinical success rate of a stentgraft used in patients with challenging neck anatomy outside the instructions for use (IFU) but within objective anatomical limits. METHODS: This was a prospective, international, multicentre, observational study. From 1 February 2012 to 1 September 2017, patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm with a challenging infrarenal neck that were deemed suitable for endovascular aneurysm repair were included prospectively at 23 European centres. Patients were distributed by anatomy into three groups: short neck (SN; infrarenal neck 5 - 10 mm in combination with suprarenal angulation [α] ≤ 45° and infrarenal angulation [ß] ≤ 60°); medium neck (MN; infrarenal neck 10 - 15 mm with α ≤ 60° and ß 60° - 75° or α 45°- 60° and ß ≤ 75°; and long angulated neck (LN; infrarenal neck ≥ 15 mm with α ≤ 75° and ß 75°- 90° or α 60°- 75° and ß ≤ 90°. All computed tomography scans were reviewed by an independent core laboratory. Primary outcomes were technical and clinical success. Secondary endpoints were peri-operative major adverse events, all cause mortality, aneurysm related mortality, endoleaks, migration, and secondary intervention. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients (81.3% male) were included (SN = 55, MN = 16, LN = 79). The median follow up was 36 ± 12.6 months. In the overall cohort, the technical success rate was 93.3%. Estimated freedom from aneurysm related death was 97.3% at three years. Freedom from secondary interventions was 84.7% at three years. Estimated clinical success was 96.0%, 90.8%, and 83.2% at 30 days, one year, and three years, respectively. Estimated freedom from all cause mortality, late type IA endoleak, and migration at three years was 75.1%, 93.7%, and 99.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The early and midterm results of the EAGLE registry show that endovascular repair with the Endurant stentgraft in selected patients with challenging infrarenal neck anatomy yields results in line with large "real world" registries. Long term results are awaited for more definitive conclusions.

Interpectoral-pectoserratus plane (PECS II) block in patients undergoing trans-axillary thoracic outlet decompression surgery; A prospective double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate if an interpectoral-pectoserratus plane (PECS II) block decreases postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting and improves quality of recovery in patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) undergoing trans-axillary thoracic outlet decompression surgery. DESIGN: A prospective single center double blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Perioperative period; operating room, post anesthesia care unit (PACU) and hospital ward. PATIENTS: Seventy patients with NTOS, undergoing trans-axillary thoracic outlet decompression surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to an interventional arm, receiving the block with 40 ml ropivacaine 0.5% (concentration was adjusted if the patient's weight was <66 kg), and a placebo group, receiving a sham block with 40 ml NaCl 0.9%. The interpectoral-pectoserratus plane block was performed ultrasound guided; the first injection below the pectoral minor muscle and the second below the pectoral major muscle. The hospitals' pharmacist prepared the study medication and was the only person able to see the randomization result. The study was blinded for patients, researchers and medical personnel. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome parameters were postoperative pain, measured by numeric rating scale on the PACU (start and end) and on the ward on postoperative day (POD) 0 and 1, and postoperative morphine consumption, measured on the PACU and on the ward during the first 24 h. Secondary outcome parameters were postoperative nausea and vomiting, and quality of recovery. MAIN RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in NRS on the PACU at the start (ropivacaine 4.9 ± 3.2 vs placebo 6.2 ± 3.0, p = .07), at the end (ropivacaine 4.0 ± 1.7 vs placebo 3.9 ± 1.7, p = .77), on the ward on POD 0 (ropivacaine 4.6 ± 2.0 vs placebo 4.6 ± 2.0, p = 1.00) or POD 1 (ropivacaine 3.9 ± 1.8 vs placebo 3.6 ± 2.0, p = .53). There was no difference in postoperative morphine consumption at the PACU (ropivacaine 11.0 mg ± 6.5 vs placebo 10.8 mg ± 4.8, p = .91) or on the ward (ropivacaine 11.6 mg ± 8.5 vs placebo 9.6 mg ± 9.4, p = .39). CONCLUSIONS: The interpectoral-pectoserratus plane block is not effective for postoperative analgesia in patients with NTOS undergoing trans-axillary thoracic outlet decompression surgery.

Impact of Personalized Outcomes Forecasts on Clinical Reasoning of Physical Therapists in Intermittent Claudication: A Vignette Study.

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines recommend supervised exercise therapy and lifestyle counseling by a physical therapist as initial treatment for patients with intermittent claudication. However, guidelines provide only a crude estimate of the outcomes that therapists and patients might expect from treatment. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of personalized outcomes forecasts (POFs) on the decision-making process of physical therapists and to learn lessons on facilitating the use of forecasts in daily practice. METHODS: A vignette-based, think-aloud interview study design was used. The participants were physical therapists trained in treating patients with intermittent claudication. Vignettes described fictitious patients diagnosed with intermittent claudication and included POFs. A directed approach was used to code, organize, and describe the data. Transcripts were analyzed using a thematic approach. RESULTS: Sixteen therapists participated in the study. Three themes were identified: (1) setting and contextualizing treatment expectations, (2) setting (shared) goals and (de)motivating the patient, and (3) establishing and monitoring the treatment plan. Therapists mentioned that POFs could be useful for setting expectations and realistic treatment goals, contextualizing expected treatment response, stimulating patients to achieve their goals, and deciding on treatment frequency and treatment timing. Therapists thought POFs would be of less use for changing treatment goals during follow-up visits or for establishing intensity or type of training. CONCLUSION: To overcome challenges that may arise when adopting POFs in daily practice, adequate training of physical therapists should be conducted. Potential areas to address with training include statistical and data literacy as well as guidance on integrating POFs with existing treatment protocols. IMPACT: The use of POFs by physical therapists might contribute to a more person-centered care approach. The insights provided by this study on the first use of POFs by physical therapists can serve as an example and lesson on how to optimally implement such supporting tools into daily practice.

Reliability and validity of the elevated arm stress test in the diagnosis of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was to assess the test-retest reliability and validity of the elevated arm stress test (EAST) as measured by the duration in a cohort of patients with suspected neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS). METHODS: Patients evaluated for NTOS between January 2017 and September 2018 were identified. Test-retest reliability by the intraclass correlation coefficient was determined for duration of the EAST. For the validity analysis, patients were classified in a proven NTOS group or a symptomatic control group without NTOS using the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards and the outcome of thoracic outlet decompression surgery. A receiver operating characteristic curve was made for the duration of EAST. The area under the curve, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the EAST. RESULTS: In total, 428 patients with suspected NTOS were retrospectively analyzed. Of these patients, 61 were excluded because no EAST data was available. Another 101 patients were excluded because of inconclusive reporting standards, arterial or venous TOS, or because thoracic outlet decompression surgery was not performed or had a negative result. The validity analysis in the remaining 266 patients showed an area under the curve for the duration of the EAST of 0.62 (95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.69). The positive predictive value of the duration ranged between 65% and 66%, and the negative predictive value between 53% and 58%. For the test-retest reliability analysis, 118 patients were excluded because they performed only one measurement in a 100-day time period. Analysis in the remaining 148 patients showed an intraclass correlation coefficient value of 0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.74) for duration. CONCLUSIONS: The EAST measured by the duration showed a moderate test-retest reliability, but the discriminative value was low in the diagnosis of NTOS. The outcome of the EAST measured by the duration should be used with caution.

Reliability and validity of the standardized elevated arm stress test in the diagnosis of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: We developed a standardized elevated arm stress test (sEAST) meter to standardize patients' posture and measure additional grip and fatigue parameters. In the present prospective cohort study, we aimed to determine the reliability and validity of the sEAST in the diagnosis of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS). METHODS: Patients evaluated for NTOS between October 2018 and February 2020 were included and performed the sEAST. The patients were classified into a proven NTOS group or a symptomatic control group using the reporting standards for NTOS and the outcome of thoracic outlet decompression surgery. Healthy persons were recruited as an asymptomatic control group. The test-retest reliability, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for each sEAST parameter. RESULTS: A total of 426 patients with suspected NTOS and 147 healthy controls had performed the sEAST. The validity analysis was performed with data from 111 patients with proven NTOS, 94 symptomatic controls, and 147 asymptomatic controls. The reporting standards were inconclusive for 116 patients; 77 patients had been excluded because thoracic outlet decompression surgery had not been performed or was unsuccessful, and 28 because they had arterial or venous thoracic outlet syndrome. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the proven NTOS group compared with the asymptomatic control and symptomatic control groups ranged from 0.59 to 0.77 and 0.54 to 0.63, respectively. The positive predictive value ranged from 46% to 65% and the negative predictive value from 51% to 66%. The test-retest reliability analysis for 80 patients with multiple sEAST measurements showed moderate to good (0.52-0.87) intraclass correlation coefficient values for the duration and grip strength parameters. However, the grip fatigue parameters demonstrated poor (0.46-0.16) intraclass correlation coefficient values. CONCLUSIONS: The sEAST showed good test-retest reliability for the duration and grip strength parameters. However, the discriminative value of all sEAST parameters was low for NTOS diagnostics. The good test-retest reliability of the sEAST parameters indicates that they could be valuable outcome measures for comparison in a diagnostic care pathway.

Surgery Versus Continued Conservative Treatment for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: the First Randomised Clinical Trial (STOPNTOS Trial).

OBJECTIVE: Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) is one of the most controversial clinical entities in medicine. Several major case series have shown promising results of surgery; however, solid scientific evidence is lacking. The aim of this trial was to objectify the effect of thoracic outlet decompression (TOD). METHODS: A single centre (high volume, tertiary TOS centre), non-blinded, randomised controlled trial was conducted with parallel group design. Patients with a diagnosis of NTOS refractory to conservative therapy were randomised to one of two intervention arms, receiving either a transaxillary thoracic outlet decompression (TA-TOD) or continued conservative treatment. After three months, the conservative treated group was also offered a TA-TOD. The primary outcome was change in Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire score. Secondary outcomes were changes in Cervical Brachial Symptoms Questionnaire (CBSQ), TOS disability scale, and quality of life scores. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, three, six, and 12 months after inclusion. RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled in this trial: 25 in the TA-TOD group and 25 in the continued conservative treatment group. Follow up was completed in 24 and 22 patients, respectively. At three months, there was a statistically significant difference in DASH scores (TA-TOD: mean 45.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 38.08 - 52.21; conservative treatment: mean 64.92, 95% CI 57.54 - 72.30; p < .001). All patients in the conservative treatment group applied for surgery three months after randomisation. After surgery of the conservative treatment group, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups for all primary and secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: TA-TOD for NTOS is effective in patients who do not respond to conservative treatment. Trial register number: NL63986.100.17.

Redo surgery for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome is useful.

OBJECTIVES: Surgery for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) has shown good outcome in numerous case series. However, 5% to 30% of patients will have persistent or recurrent symptoms, caused by incomplete first rib resection, reattachment of residual scalene muscle, fibrous scarring around the brachial plexus, or a wrong NTOS diagnosis. In patients with a sound diagnosis of recurrent or persisting NTOS, not responding to conservative measures, a secondary procedure can be considered. We report the results of redo thoracic outlet decompression surgery through the supraclavicular approach (SC-REDO-TOD) for persistent or recurrent NTOS. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective database was performed. Every patient referred from September 2016 until January 2020 was eligible for inclusion. In an SC-REDO-TOD, we perform complete (cartilage-cartilage) resection of the first rib, any bony and fibrous anomalies, complete anterior and middle scalenectomy, and complete neurolysis of the brachial plexus (complete anatomical decompression of the brachial plexus). Clinical outcomes were assessed by questionnaires including the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Cervico-Brachial Symptoms Questionnaire (CBSQ), and TOS (thoracic outlet syndrome) Disability scale. RESULTS: In total, 45 patients had a SC-REDO-TOD. The median duration of hospital admission after SC-REDO-TOD was 1.41 days (interquartile range, 1.00 day). In total, 30 (66.66%) of 45 patients had recurrent NTOS, and 15 (33.33%) of 45 patients had persisting NTOS. Postoperative complications were seen in eight patients (18.18%). One patient had postoperative complications with permanent impairment (Horner syndrome). Seven patients had postoperative complications with full recovery (three patients had a chylous leakage that was treated with a median-chain triglycerides diet for 6 weeks, three patients had transient phrenic nerve palsy with full recovery <6 weeks, and one patient had a discrete Horner syndrome that resolved in 6 weeks). The median time of follow-up was 19.50 months (interquartile range, 14.00 months) and the response rate to the questionnaires was 91.11% at 6 months and 64.44% at 12 months. We found a positive and statistically significant difference for DASH score, CBSQ score, and TOS Disability Scale score comparing scores for all patients. (DASH score: P < .001; CBSQ score: P < .001; TOS Disability Scale: P < .001). Patients with first rib remnants showed a significant better response (lower DASH, CBSQ and TOS Disability Scale scores) compared with patients without first rib remnants (DASH score: P = .004; CBSQ score: P ≤ .014; TOS Disability Scale: P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: SC-REDO-TOD after a previous NTOS surgery shows good results with a low risk of permanent impairment. Patients with NTOS with first rib remnants after primary surgery seem to benefit the most from SC-REDO-TOD surgery.

Personalised Outcomes Forecasts of Supervised Exercise Therapy in Intermittent Claudication: An Application of Neighbours Based Prediction Methods with Routinely Collected Clinical Data.

OBJECTIVE: Insights regarding individual patient prognosis may improve exercise therapy by informing patient expectations, promoting exercise adherence, and facilitating tailored care. Therefore, the aim was to develop and evaluate personalised outcomes forecasts for functional claudication distance over six months of supervised exercise therapy for patients with intermittent claudication. METHODS: Data of 5 940 patients were eligible for analysis. Neighbours based predictions were generated via an adaptation of predictive mean matching. Data from the nearest 223 matches (a.k.a. neighbours) for an index patient were modelled via Generalised Additive Model for Location Scale and Shape (GAMLSS). The realised outcome measures were then evaluated against the GAMLSS model, and the average bias, coverage, and precision were calculated. Model calibration was analysed via within sample and of sample analyses. RESULTS: Neighbours based predictions demonstrated small average bias (- 0.04 standard deviations; ideal = 0) and accurate average coverage (48.7% of realised data within 50% prediction interval; ideal = 50%). Moreover, neighbours based predictions improved prediction precision by 24%, compared with estimates derived from the whole sample. Both within sample and of sample testing showed predictions to be well calibrated. CONCLUSION: Neighbours based prediction is a method for generating accurate personalised outcomes forecasts for patients with intermittent claudication undertaking supervised exercise therapy. Future work should examine the influence of personalised outcomes forecasts on clinical decisions and patient outcomes.

Thoracic outlet decompression surgery for Gilliatt-Sumner hand as a presentation of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Chronic compression of the inferior trunk of the brachial plexus can result in severe pain and progressive atrophy and weakness of the musculature of the forearm and hand, known as Gilliatt-Sumner hand (GSH). The objective of treatment for these patients is to stop further atrophy and pain. Restoration of motor function has been thought to be seldom achieved. The aim of the present contemporary case series was to describe the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of surgery for GSH. METHODS: All patients referred between January 2017 and May 2021 with visible signs of a GSH were included. Visible GSH signs were defined as muscle atrophy of the abductor digiti minimi, abductor pollicis brevis, and/or interosseous musculature. All the patients had undergone additional electrodiagnostic (ED) assessments and high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) studies. All the patients with a diagnosis of GSH had undergone thoracic outlet decompression (TOD) surgery using a transaxillary or supraclavicular approach. The outcomes were measured using the thoracic outlet syndrome disability scale, cervical brachial symptom questionnaire, and disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand scale scores and patient-reported outcomes of motor function, measured using a numerical rating scale (NRS). The standardized elevated arm stress test (sEAST) was used to assess the patients' motor function before and after TOD surgery. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients had been referred to our center with visible signs of a GSH. The clinical examination showed atrophy of the abductor digiti minimi, abductor pollicis brevis, and interosseous musculature in all 20 patients. The ED assessments showed plexopathy of the lower brachial plexus in all the patients. HRUS showed an indented inferior trunk of the brachial plexus (so-called wedge-sickle sign) in 18 patients (90%). Of the 20 patients, 17 had undergone TOD surgery (15 transaxillary TOD and 2 supraclavicular TOD). Three patients had refrained from surgery. The median follow-up interval was 15.0 months (interquartile range, 14.0 months). The thoracic outlet syndrome disability scale score had improved significantly (preoperatively: mean, 6.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.49-7.13; postoperatively: mean, 4.25; 95% CI, 2.80-5.70; P = .026). The same improvement was seen for the cervical brachial symptom questionnaire scores (preoperatively: mean, 77.75; 95% CI, 66.63-88.87; postoperatively: mean, 42.65; 95% CI, 24.77-60.77; P = .001) and disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand scale scores (preoperatively: mean, 59.13; 95% CI, 51.49-66.77; postoperatively: mean, 40.96; 95% CI, 24.41-57.51; P = .032). The NRS score for muscle weakness and sEAST score showed no statistically significant differences before and after TOD for the whole group (mean preoperative NRS score for muscle weakness, 6.22; 95% CI, 4.31-8.14; mean postoperative NRS score for muscle weakness, 5.11; 95% CI, 3.25-6.97; P = .269). However, four patients (23.52%) had reported a ≥50% decrease in the NRS score for muscle weakness and a minimum increase of 20% in the total and average force using the sEAST. The NRS for numbness showed a statistically significant decrease for the whole group (preoperatively: mean, 5.67; 95% CI, 4.18-7.16; postoperatively: mean, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.37-5.29; P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of physical examination, ED assessments, and HRUS studies can differentiate GSH in the differential diagnosis. HRUS appears to have an advantage over ED studies in confirming GSH by visualization of compression of the brachial plexus. TOD surgery will stop the progressive muscle atrophy and significantly reduce neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome complaints, and, in some patients, motor function will recover.

The Effect of Arterial Disease Level on Outcomes of Supervised Exercise Therapy for Intermittent Claudication: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether level of arterial obstruction determines the effectiveness of SET in patients with IC. BACKGROUND DATA: Guidelines advocate SET before invasive treatment for IC, but early revascularization remains widespread, especially in patients with aortoiliac disease. METHODS: Patients were recruited from 10 Dutch centers between October 2017 and October 2018. Participants received SET first, followed by endovascular or open revascularization in case of insufficient effect. They were grouped according to level of stenosis (aortoiliac, femoropopliteal, multilevel, or rest group with no significant stenosis). Changes from baseline walking performance (maximal and functional walking distance on a treadmill test, 6-minute walk test) and vascular quality of life questionnaire-6 at 3 and 6 months were compared, after multivariate adjustment for possible confounders. Freedom from revascularization was estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Some 267 patients were eligible for analysis (aortoiliac n = 70, 26%; femoropopliteal n = 115, 43%; multilevel n = 69, 26%; rest n = 13, 5%). No between group differences in walking performance or vascular quality of life questionnaire-6 were found. Mean improvement in maximal walking distance after 6 months was 439 m [99% confidence interval (CI) 297-581], 466 m (99% CI 359-574), 353 m (99% CI 210-496), and 403 m (99% CI 58-749), respectively (P = 0.40). Freedom from intervention was 73.9% for aortoiliac disease and 88.6% for femoropopliteal disease (hazard ratio 2.46, 99% CI 0.96 - 6.30, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term effectiveness of SET for IC is not determined by the location of stenosis. Although aortoiliac disease patients improved walking performance and health-related quality of life similarly compared to other arterial disease level groups, they underwent revascularization more often.

Using a Learning Health System to Improve Physical Therapy Care for Patients With Intermittent Claudication: Lessons Learned From the ClaudicatioNet Quality System.

Routinely collected outcomes data can be used to improve physical therapy care through benchmarking, personalization, continued education, and treatment optimization. This article describes how a nationwide infrastructure to routinely collect data from daily practice was created and how these data were used through a support system (called the ClaudicatioNet Quality system) to improve physical therapy care for patients with intermittent claudication in the Netherlands. ClaudicatioNet is a nationwide network of 2100 specialized physical therapists, providing high-quality supervised exercise therapy in combination with lifestyle counseling. The ClaudicatioNet Quality system uses a large national registry in which specific relevant health outcomes have been routinely collected since 2015. These data have then been used in turn to assess quality of care and provide transparency to therapists and other stakeholders. The Quality system is intended to serve as a learning health system, to support continuous learning at the therapist, practice, and network level. In this approach, individual patients and physical therapists are provided with opportunities to personalize, benchmark, and evaluate (and possibly alter) a treatment plan using routinely collected data from historical patients. The Quality system is described based on the essential elements of a learning health system. The challenges and lessons learned in developing the Quality system also are described. IMPACT: The use of routinely collected health outcomes can, if implemented correctly, facilitate continuous learning among physical therapists and contribute to person-centered care. This example of a learning health system might serve as a blueprint for physical therapists on how to optimally implement and distill meaning from routinely collected clinical data.